Two senior farmworkers smiling together with a box of Half Moon Bay produce

555 Kelly · Half Moon Bay · November 3 Ballot

Vote YES for 555 Kelly

Keeping the promise Half Moon Bay already made: 40 affordable apartments so local senior farmworkers can retire with dignity, close to the community they helped build — at no cost to taxpayers.

Summary

What it does

Measure Q asks voters to ratify the City Council's approval of a 99-year ground lease letting Mercy Housing California build 40 affordable apartments for senior farmworkers at 555 Kelly Avenue. The City keeps ownership of the land for the full term.

Why it matters

The State has already sued Half Moon Bay for failing to comply with State housing law, specifically asking the courts to mandate the approval of any affordable housing that the City rejects through a referendum. The State has never lost a case like this, and other cities have paid many millions in fines, penalties and legal expenses.

What a Yes vote means

Keeping a commitment the City already made to our farmworkers, avoiding very costly legal exposure, and doing the right thing by moving a fully reviewed, already-approved project forward.

Why Vote Yes

From the official ballot argument in favor of Measure Q:

Fiscally responsible — no cost to taxpayers

555 Kelly provides 40 affordable apartments for senior farmworkers at no cost to Half Moon Bay taxpayers. The City contributes land through a lease, not cash — Mercy Housing bears the development and operating costs.

The financial risk of a No vote is real

The State of California has already sued Half Moon Bay over affordable housing compliance. State law bars cities from rejecting housing like this even by referendum — courts can force approval anyway and fine the City up to $10,000 per unit, per month.

A No vote could trigger Builder's Remedy

Blocking the lease risks unchecked development being forced on Half Moon Bay and potentially diverts millions in taxpayer money from vital services toward legal fees, fines, and penalties.

Years of review — already approved

The project has been fully reviewed and approved after over four years of Council negotiation, multiple Planning Commission and Architectural Review meetings, and extensive public input. Measure Q asks voters to ratify that decision.

Quick Facts

40affordable apartments for senior farmworkers, 55+
$0cost to Half Moon Bay taxpayers to build or operate
$25M+already secured in outside funding, incl. a $2M state grant
14%of the City's required affordable housing allocation (RHNA)

The building

  • 5-story building: 3 studios, 34 one-bedroom, 3 two-bedroom apartments
  • Community Room with commercial kitchen available to the public for events
  • 18 on-site resident parking spaces in the project's own garage
  • 28 reconfigured spaces at the Ted Adcock Community Center parking lot remain available for public use
  • On-site property management and resident services from Mercy Housing California
Architectural rendering of the 555 Kelly building, side view
Rendering of 555 Kelly.

Frequently Asked Questions

The Measure

What is Measure Q?

Measure Q asks Half Moon Bay voters to approve Ordinance No. 2026-01, authorizing a 99-year ground lease and related agreements between the City and Mercy Housing California to build a 40-unit affordable housing community for senior agricultural workers at 535–555 Kelly Avenue.

What does a "Yes" vote mean? What happens if it fails?

A "Yes" vote confirms the City Council's approval of the ground lease and lets the project move forward as planned. A "No" vote blocks the lease and stops the project — years of negotiation and secured funding could be lost or put at risk, and the City's exposure to state legal penalties, fines, and loss of grants would escalate.

Didn't the City Council already approve this? Why a referendum at all?

Yes — the Council spent over four years negotiating lease terms with Mercy Housing before approving it. After that approval, opponents gathered signatures to force a public vote rather than let the Council's decision stand, so the Council placed the question on the November 3 ballot for voters to decide directly. Measure Q asks voters to ratify the Council's decision.

Who pays for it — is this a burden on city taxpayers?

No. The project is funded through state and local affordable housing dollars, not local taxes, and has already secured over $25 million in outside funding, including a $2 million state grant. The City contributes land through a lease — not cash — and keeps ownership of the parcel for the full 99-year term while Mercy Housing bears the development and operating costs.

Is the City legally required to build affordable housing somewhere?

Yes. Like every California city, Half Moon Bay must plan for its share of regional housing needs (RHNA), including housing affordable to lower-income households. The City is facing real legal and financial exposure over slow progress on these obligations.

The Project Itself

Why is the building five stories high?

The original proposal was a four-story building of 40 studio apartments. After public input, Mercy Housing added one-bedroom units to better serve residents' needs, which required a fifth story to keep the total at 40 apartments. In response to further comment, the overall height was reduced and the fifth floor recessed so it isn't visible from Kelly Avenue — no views are blocked, and the building is only five feet taller than the original 4 story design.

Won't the project cause traffic problems on Kelly Avenue?

The gym across the street has hosted events with 1,300 attendees, and the church next door regularly hosts large events already — the Coastside has managed this scale of activity before.

With Ted Adcock Center and the middle school nearby, what about safety?

This is the same concern raised when the Coast House opened nearby as a temporary homeless shelter. No incidents have been reported since, and the same level of safety is expected here.

Why focus solely on senior farmworkers?

Housing needs exist across many groups in our community, but not proceeding with this project benefits no one — it simply leaves the site undeveloped while the need continues.

Shouldn't a different location be considered?

Kelly Avenue is closest to essential services for residents. Alternatives all have significant drawbacks: Beachwood can't be built on due to environmental concerns, the former Bay City Flowers site is privately owned, and the Metzgar Street parcel is earmarked for future affordable housing. The City already owns this property and can dedicate it to high-priority affordable housing now.

Wasn't this project pushed through without proper process?

555 Kelly has had more scrutiny than nearly any project in Half Moon Bay history: changes from the Architectural Review Committee, multiple Planning Commission meetings, numerous public meetings with stakeholders that led to changes in the apartment layout, a City-appointed Ad Hoc Committee that negotiated enhancements to the Community Room, and multiple Council study sessions.

Who's Behind This

Who is Mercy Housing?

Mercy Housing is a national nonprofit affordable housing developer and one of the largest in the country. Under the ground lease, they would own, build, and operate 555 Kelly — the City retains ownership of the land itself for the full 99-year term.

Who supports Measure Q?

Supporters include Mercy Housing, Ayudando Latinos a Soñar (ALAS), other local nonprofits, Coastside Faith Leaders, and the Half Moon Bay City Council, which approved the underlying agreements.

Where can I learn more?

See the Links section below for source documents from the City, the architects, and ALAS.

Endorsements

Jackie Speier smiling in a professional headshot, wearing a magenta blazer with a bird-shaped brooch

“Half Moon Bay’s lifeblood is agriculture. Supporting the health and safety of its elderly farmworkers is part of that commitment. Yes on Q also helps avoid significant fines and other state sanctions that Half Moon Bay may have to endure if Q doesn’t pass. A wise choice is on the ballot. Please vote Yes on Q.”

Jackie SpeierSan Mateo County Supervisor
Deborah Penrose smiling in a professional headshot, wearing a dark turtleneck sweater

“As a Councilmember who has seen the positive evolution of the 555 project for dignified housing for our senior farmworkers, I am proud to endorse Yes on Q so we as a City can go forward in showing our respect for our agricultural heritage.”

Deborah PenroseHalf Moon Bay City Councilmember
Rick Bonilla smiling outdoors, wearing a wide-brimmed hat with a gray beard

“I urge support for the Senior Farmworker Housing at 555 Kelly in Half Moon Bay for some very good reasons. First, it is sorely needed. Second, it will not be paid for by taxpayers of Half Moon Bay. Third, it will help the city meet its state required regional housing needs allocation (RHNA). In closing, since there is no state certified housing element, I have two key words: BUILDERS REMEDY!”

Rick BonillaHousing Advocate
Josh Becker smiling in a professional headshot, wearing glasses and a navy suit

“I’m proud to stand in support of the 555 Kelly development and stand for the referendum. When completed this will be a project that the community is proud of. One that honors the hard work of our farm worker communities, but also brings more residents downtown and adds to the wonderful community that is Half Moon Bay.”

Josh BeckerCalifornia State Senator

“Coastside Faith in Action, with members on the Coastside from Pacifica to Pescadero, represents many faith traditions. Together with our parent organization, Faith in Action Bay Area, we listen to the needs of marginalized people on the Coastside and work with them to create change. Many farmworkers older than 55 continue to work in the fields because they cannot afford to retire. These are the people 555 Kelly will serve. We urge you to vote Yes on Measure Q.”

Coastside Faith in ActionFaith-based community organization

How to Help

Volunteer

Help with canvassing, phone banking, or yard signs ahead of November.

Sign Up to Volunteer (opens in a new tab)